• Home
• Who We Are
  • SAS 70 Type II Report
• What is a Captive?
  • Benefits of Captive Insurance
  • Types of Captives
  • How Captives Work
  • Advantages of Captive Programs
  • Disadvantages of Captives
  • Georgia Captive Law
  • South Carolina Captive Law
• Captive Mangement Services
  • Role of Captive Manager
  • Changing Captive Managers
  • Feasibility Study Services
  • Types of Services
• Third Party Administration
  • Risk Management
  • Underwriting
  • Policy Issuance
  • Claims Processing
  • Administrative Oversight
  • Secure Web-Based Software

Disadvantages of Captives

We've already discussed some of the costs and risks of captive insurance programs (see Types of Captives and How They Work).  Here is a summary of the most frequently identified disadvantages.

General Captive Disadvantages

Captive programs: 

• present the risk of financial loss to owners as well as financial gain;
• require an up-front capital investment;
• in some circumstances, may present uncertainty as to the federal tax treatment of premiums and captive profits;
• are not as easy to enter and exist compared to purchasing insurance from the commercial market;
• may decrease an insured's purchasing power for other coverage in the commercial market, and
• requires management time to participate on the captive's board and manage captive investments.

Pure Captive Disadvantages

In addition to general disadvantages, pure captives:

• may have fewer insureds to pool and spread risk resulting in more variable year-to-year captive financial results (this risk can be addressed through reinsurance); and
• issue certificates of insurance that may not be acceptable to some third parties.

Group Captive Disadvantages (Association, Risk Retention Group)

In addition to general disadvantages, group captives:

• take longer to form; 
• may not offer the best policy form for each and every insured;
• may utilize service providers that offer less than optimal services;
• offer much less control over claims handling than do pure captives;
• may required insureds to share in the poor loss experience of others;
• require higher overall levels of capital than do pure captives;
• tend to be more reliant on the availability and cost of reinsurance;
• tend to be more political and subject to decision-making problems as respects captive governance;
• may present conflicts regarding profit and earnings distributions;
• offer less confidentiality;
• are subject to greater regulatory requirements;
• are more complex and at-risk regarding taxation and ownership;
• are at a high risk of losing members (and their capital) to competing programs; and
• insureds may not be able to easily exit a group captive program.

Sponsored / Protected Cell Captive Disadvantages

While insureds do not need to provide up-front capital to participate in a sponsored / protected cell captive, the following disadvantages are present with these programs:

• policy forms may be dictated by the sponsor;
• insureds do not have a choice of whom their service providers are;
• sponsors usually require that each cell be fully funded or collateralized up to the aggregate limit of liability, with such collateral being held for a number of years;
• the IRS may not deem the arrangement as insurance for federal tax purposes;
• excess funds in a cell may not be released by the sponsor for a number of years; and
• conflicts of interest between the sponsor and insured are more likely.

nimblehealthan NTS product